Relativistic invariance: The Dirac algebra 
	CONNECTION TO KLEIN-GORDON EQUATION
	Multiplying the second equation from the left with the operator of the first (or vice versa) yields
	
	   The resulting operator becomes the kernel of the Klein-Gordon equation only, if
	
	The resulting operator becomes the kernel of the Klein-Gordon equation only, if
	
	   This infact defines the γ matrices. An explicit representation in terms of the Pauli 
	matrices and the unit matrix is given by
	
	This infact defines the γ matrices. An explicit representation in terms of the Pauli 
	matrices and the unit matrix is given by
	
	   Since, after explicit calculation in this representation,
	
	Since, after explicit calculation in this representation,
	
	   the E.o.M. for the daggered spinor can now be obtained from the one for the undaggered one:
	
	the E.o.M. for the daggered spinor can now be obtained from the one for the undaggered one:
	
	   as before. The trick here was to multiply from the right with γ0 in the last step.
	
	as before. The trick here was to multiply from the right with γ0 in the last step.
	
	CURRENT AND CHARGE
	Combining the E.o.M. for the barred and the unbarred spinors, i.e. adding them, yields
	
	   a perfect candidate for a conserved current. The corresponding density is positive, by construction,
	and therefore perfectly suited to describe a particle density. Needless to stress that the current
	transforms like a four-vector.
	
	a perfect candidate for a conserved current. The corresponding density is positive, by construction,
	and therefore perfectly suited to describe a particle density. Needless to stress that the current
	transforms like a four-vector.
	
	STATES
	In a next step, let's try to construct plane wave solutions of the Dirac equation with positive or 
	negative energies: Both signs should appear, after all, the Dirac equation is a linearisation of the
	Klein-Gordon equation involving more degrees of freedom, but it should now be possible to map 
	the different energy signs onto specific solutions. So, for this case, let's try an ansatz of the
	form
	
	   where the signs in the superscript indicate the sign of the energy. The Dirac equation now implies that
	for particles at rest the two solutions must satisfy
	
	where the signs in the superscript indicate the sign of the energy. The Dirac equation now implies that
	for particles at rest the two solutions must satisfy
	
	   where the entries in the matrices are to be understood as 2x2 matrices. This shows that the solutions
	given above for the eigenstates are indeed deeply rooted in the form of the E.o.M.s.
	
	where the entries in the matrices are to be understood as 2x2 matrices. This shows that the solutions
	given above for the eigenstates are indeed deeply rooted in the form of the E.o.M.s.
	
	Starting form these solutions for the particles at rest, it would be simple to perform a boost in
	order to obtain the solutions for the particles moving. However, rather than so doing, it is simpler
	to observe that 
	
	   and to write
	
	and to write
	
	   where in both cases E is defined as the corresponding positive quantity. Now, it is time to
	specify the normnalisation factor N in front of the spinors at rest. It will turn out that
	a convenient choice is
	
	where in both cases E is defined as the corresponding positive quantity. Now, it is time to
	specify the normnalisation factor N in front of the spinors at rest. It will turn out that
	a convenient choice is
	
	   The latter identity of course holds true only for particles at rest, where E = m.
	For the conjugate spinors similar equations hold true, i.e.
		
	The latter identity of course holds true only for particles at rest, where E = m.
	For the conjugate spinors similar equations hold true, i.e.
	
	   implying that the base states are orthogonal with norm N:
	
	implying that the base states are orthogonal with norm N:
	
	   with all other combinations vanishing. The quantisation of the Dirac field proceeds in the usual 
	way: For each degree of freedom a corresponding creation operator is introduced; their complex
	conjugates being the annihilation operators. Therefore, altogether four creation operators
	are defined, which are multiplied with "their" respective spinor component and a plane wave
	factor. However, this will not be discussed here in great detail.
	
	with all other combinations vanishing. The quantisation of the Dirac field proceeds in the usual 
	way: For each degree of freedom a corresponding creation operator is introduced; their complex
	conjugates being the annihilation operators. Therefore, altogether four creation operators
	are defined, which are multiplied with "their" respective spinor component and a plane wave
	factor. However, this will not be discussed here in great detail. 
	
	PROJECTORS ON POSITIVE OR NEGATIVE ENERGIES
	Consider now the matrices
	
	   and similarly for the negative energy states,
	
	and similarly for the negative energy states,
	
	   They serve as projectors onto positive and negative energy states. Their sum equals 2m,
	squaring them results - up to a factor of 2m - in the original projector.
	
	They serve as projectors onto positive and negative energy states. Their sum equals 2m,
	squaring them results - up to a factor of 2m - in the original projector.